I'm always on the lookout for great cheap headphones, so when CNET's Matthew Moskovciak suggested I try Sony's MDR-ZX100 I jumped at the chance. We were both knocked out by Sony's MDR-V6 and MDR-7506 headphones,
so I bought a pair of MDR-ZX100s on Amazon for $15. I had no
expectations it would threaten those two amazing Sonys, but at less than
20 percent of those headphones' current prices I was curious to see how
much of the magic trickled down to the MDR-ZX100. The MDR-V6 and
MDR-7506 were both designed more than twenty years ago, when Sony was at
the top of its game. The MDR-ZX100 is just a baby, and debuted a few
years ago when Sony was churning out new models by the boatload, so
quality is a lot more hit or miss. Then again, it's earned 1,100
five-star Amazon user reviews and just 70 one-star pans, so the
MDR-ZX100 can't be too bad.
As dirt cheap headphones go the MDR-ZX100 looks pretty good. The ear cups pivot vertically and
horizontally, so they readily conform to most ear and head shapes. The
round ear pads' head clamping pressure is moderate; so comfort is
surprisingly good, I can wear these things for hours and not feel
fatigued. The all-plastic design is available in black or white, and
feels reasonably sturdy, but I doubt you'll be passing these down to
your grand kids.
The MDR-ZX100 is a closed-back design with 30 mm drivers and a 24 ohm
rated impedance. The 48 inch long "Y" cable is permanently attached to
both ear cups, the cable is a little thicker than average and reinforced
where it meets the ear cups and 3.5 mm plug. The headphone weighs just
4.2 ounces, that's unusually light, but it's not hinged, so it'll take
up a bit of room in your back-pack.
The sound is decent, the main knock against the MDR-ZX100 is that it sounds a little "canned" plugged into my
iPod Classic.
The sound is stuck inside my head, tonally it's lightweight, and the
treble isn't very clear or clean. Yup, it's $15, so all of that is no
surprise. A quick comparison with the MDR-V6 revealed day and night
differences between the two headphones. The MDR-V6 is easier on the
ears, has better resolution, it's sweeter and more comfortable, so if
you can afford the difference, go for the MDR-V6. On the upside, the
MDR-ZX100's softer treble may make nasty sounding MP3s easier to take.
Then I plugged the MDR-ZX100 into the $249 Schiit Audio Asgard 2
headphone amp (review in the works) and that demonstrated just how good
the MDR-ZX100 can sound. When I just focused on the tunes and forgot
about the price and turned off my inner critic, I enjoyed the sound. As
long as you don't compare them to anything you might be perfectly happy
with the MDR-ZX100.
Thing is, I am a critic, so to finish up I compared the MDR-ZX100 with the $23 MonoPrice 8323 headphones with my
iPod. It
was a close contest, the two headphones treat vocals, guitars, and horns
well, but the 8323's treble and bass are more transparent and clear,
but they are bigger and bulkier headphones. And 50 percent more
expensive, so I'd go with the 8323. Fifteen bucks might just be too low
for audiophile quality, but I will continue to search for greatness on
the cheap. Then again, CNET's David Carnoy regularly finds very decent headphones for less than $25.
So the question remains: can Sony make a $15 full-size headphone an
audiophile can love? Maybe, but the MDR-ZX100 misses the mark.
No comments:
Post a Comment